Norway's wealth tax and the entrepreneurs it chased away

Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:02:23 +1000

Norway taxes unrealised gains. About 1% a year, calculated on full market value for listed assets and book value for private companies, assessed on whatever your net worth happens to be on New Year’s Eve. It doesn’t matter if your startup is loss-making with no cash flow, if your portfolio has since tanked, or if the company has gone bankrupt since the valuation date. The bill still arrives.

hagaetc.eth lays this out in Norway Shrugged, an Atlas Shrugged-flavoured account of watching Norway’s entrepreneurial class walk out the door.

The numbers back the framing. 100 of Norway’s top 400 taxpayers, representing half that group’s wealth, emigrated in two years. The founders of Dune and Cognite left. Oda’s founders left too, and the company is now valued at zero. Exit tax on the way out sits at 38% of total asset value. Meanwhile the wealth tax itself contributes less than 2% of the state budget it is supposedly there to fund.

Sweden scrapped its own wealth tax in 2007 and grew a genuine tech sector out of the decision. Spotify now carries a bigger market cap than Equinor, Norway’s oil major and the closest thing the country has to a national champion. That comparison alone should sting.

This is the law of unintended consequences at work. Tax unrealised gains hard enough and you don’t get a fairer distribution of wealth, you get an exodus, and the next Dune or Cognite gets built in London or Zug instead of Oslo. Capital is mobile. Talent that can afford to relocate is more mobile still.

But abolish wealth tax altogether and you hand high net worth individuals a different loophole. Borrow against unrealised capital gains, spend the proceeds and never sell the underlying equity. No sale, no capital gain, no income, no tax. The wealth compounds untaxed indefinitely while everyone still earning a wage keeps paying theirs. That’s not a hypothetical. It’s standard practice for anyone with a large enough share portfolio and a private banker on speed dial.

So some form of wealth tax is defensible, as the only lever left once income and capital gains can be dodged this cleanly. The problem isn’t the concept. It’s Norway’s execution: a rate high enough to punish paper losses and bankrupt founders, applied unilaterally in a world where capital crosses borders faster than legislation does. The fix isn’t zero wealth tax. It’s a rate that doesn’t chase your best founders offshore, ideally set in step with the rest of the EU and comparable economies so capital can’t simply relocate to whichever jurisdiction taxes it least.

None of that works without a level of trust that Norway’s own numbers are now undermining. The author claims it spends 45% more than Sweden on healthcare for similar outcomes, carries 2.5 times Denmark’s sick leave rate, spends roughly 50% more than Finland on schooling for worse results and sank 35 billion NOK into offshore wind its own analysis called financially unviable. Norway held 7 of the Nordic region’s 30 most valuable companies fifteen years ago. It holds 2 now. Raising the tax is only half the job. Spending it well is the other half, and on hagaetc.eth’s account Norway has quietly stopped doing that too.

Those of us in countries with genuine universal healthcare, decent public education and a real social safety net have a stake in getting this balance right. Fight for integrity in the tax system, sure, but fight just as hard for the money raised to be spent like it matters. Norway looks like a warning on both counts.

Sources:

Norway Shrugged - hagaetc.eth, Paragraph, November 2024

Rambling Rows

Norway's wealth tax and the entrepreneurs it chased away