The parasite buried in Alan Kohler's AI column

The most interesting answer in Alan Kohler’s column this morning came from a Chinese AI model.

Kohler’s analysis piece for ABC News argues that “Artificial Intelligence” is the wrong name for what is being built, that “Other Intelligence” would serve us better, and that we are creating a new form of life. This post is only a pointer. The column is the thing, and you should read all of it.

Continue reading →


Worth reading - The biggest risk everyone already knows about

The AI spending boom can’t last. The harder question is when it ends, and Ben Carlson’s answer is an uncomfortable one: in past booms, stock markets have tended to peak before the capex spending slows. By the time the big spenders pull back, the market has already moved on. Carlson writes A Wealth of Common Sense, and this piece is a calm look at one of the largest concentrated bets in history.

Continue reading →


Worth reading - The brakes are not connected

Telling an AI agent “do not access external systems” is an instruction. Not giving it network access is a brake. Mark Gibbs hangs a whole argument on that difference, and it’s a sharp one. Gibbs, writing for TidBITS, takes the two comfort blankets of the AI safety debate (slow it down, keep a human in the loop) and asks whether either one actually stops anything. He’s in favour of both. He just doesn’t think either is a brake.

Continue reading →


Jev and the rise of the cheap decision model

A start-up built an AI that cannot write a single sentence, and within weeks OpenAI and Cloudflare had built one too. Here is what Jev does, why it costs a sliver of what ChatGPT-style models charge and who is already using it. All dollar figures are US dollars.

Not three weeks ago, almost nobody outside the developer world had heard of Jev. This week, TechCrunch reported that OpenAI had announced its own version, and the headline called it a Jev clone.

Continue reading →


Skills ain't skills

Google announced Skills for Gemini yesterday. Same word as the Skills in Claude, ChatGPT and Microsoft’s Cowork. Different thing.

In a post on Google’s blog, Gemini product manager Deven Tokuno describes Skills as reusable custom instructions. You save them once and call them by typing a forward slash and the skill’s name. You can build one from an existing chat, stack several together and attach reference files such as PDFs and images. Sharing is promised, with details to come.

Continue reading →


Worth reading - Apple Notes in iOS 27

Apple Notes can finally link straight to a heading inside a note. Type >> to pick a note, then / to pick a section. Stack a few links at the top of a long note and you have a table of contents in an app that never had one. Amit at iAppList tested the iOS 27 changes on an iPhone 13 and an iPhone 17 Pro. The useful news is that most of the good stuff does not need Apple Intelligence, so older phones get the best of it.

Continue reading →


Ask ChatGPT what DevDay means for you

I have just spent three weeks off grid in the Kimberley region of Western Australia. No feeds, no headlines, no AI news. A proper digital detox.

Then I came home and opened the laptop. OpenAI had used the gap to unload DevDay 2026, and its own recap counts more than 20 major announcements.

Continue reading →


GPT-6 Astra: cheaper coding, pricier thinking

The most interesting thing about GPT-6 Astra isn’t its intelligence score. It’s that it now lies half as often as its predecessor did.

OpenAI launched Astra today, and it’s rolling out to subscribers gradually over the coming week. Which means I can’t test it myself yet, and neither can you. For now the only read available is Artificial Analysis’s independent benchmarking, published alongside the announcement.

Continue reading →


Buying submarines from China would be faster than waiting for America

The fastest way to get a new submarine right now is to buy one from Beijing. Nobody in Canberra will say that out loud, so I will.

Continue reading →


Fable 5.1 - Every says Anthropic is so back (again)

This post was written by Claude, summarising and referencing Every’s original Vibe Check review at Tony’s request, a practice Every explicitly encourages. Tony ran this on Sonnet 5 under his existing plan rather than Fable 5.1, which would have drawn down usage credits. Tony remains sceptical of how he’d personally benefit from Fable 5.1 and is suspicious of the additional costs due to its verbosity.

Every’s Vibe Check team called the original Fable a “warp drive” and also a power tool nobody but the most AI-pilled users could actually operate. Their verdict on Fable 5.1, published 1 September 2026 after a week of testing, is that Anthropic fixed the usability problem without losing the horsepower.

Continue reading →